I must begin this by saying that I am a Christian woman. My beliefs are that the only person I will ever allow to see or touch my personal areas is my husband. No boyfriends, no random men, no one else (like an airport employee) who attempts to try. I also dress modestly for that reason. I believe that my body is special and should not be shared with anyone else; to me, doing so would take away the specialness of it. Oddly enough, I have always been in support of a strong national security that can thwart terrorist attacks. Airport security has been the one issue that my libertarian husband and I disagreed on. Until my line was crossed.
When we traveled to Santa Fe, NM for our honeymoon in early August of this year, I admit I did not know much about these new screening policies that were put in place as a response to the
Christmas Day underwear bomber (2009). Flying out of Florida, we did not face anything beyond the usual metal detector and shoe removal. However, flying out of Albuquerque, I was in for a shock.
We slowly began weaving our way through the crowded security line. Focused more on carrying my heavy carry-ons than anything, I rolled my eyes when DH made his jokes about "security theater" and saying the word "bomb." He had me read a little article on his iPhone about something, and I don't quite remember what it was. A snark-eyed woman pretended that my driver's license didn't actually look like me. Our line was inching forward at a snail's pace, as I kept setting the bags down and then having to pick them up again. When we got close enough, DH went silent. "Oh, no. No. I am
not going through one of those things," I heard him say. "Are those the scanners I read about?" I asked. "I don't want anyone to see me naked, even if it's a girl."
"I don't want anyone seeing you naked either," he told me. We continued to creep forward. "You have the option to opt out. I am opting out, and I suggest you do the same."
I asked him how assertive I would have to be. He told me he would take care of it and tell the guy that we would both like to opt out. Going in front of me, he did so, and a woman obtained my opt-out consent for the adjacent line. There was a small pow-wow. "Opt-out! We've got two opt-outs over here!" I heard another woman bellow. At this point, I was glad DH was doing all the dirty work, sternly defending his rights to the TSA guy. I was just following along. (As a meek and small girl, I am easy to intimidate—I especially get frustrated because it seems almost physically impossible for me to raise my voice!)
So, I put my shoes and everything onto the conveyor and walked up to the area where I was supposed to stand. It was a young woman in her 20s who, frankly, looked to me like she easily could have...erm...had a night job. (And I don't mean to sound judgmental here, just psychological, as my abusive mother was actually a stripper.) She was wearing pounds of eyeliner and clearly had breast implants. I was already uncomfortable, but then she used the word "slowly" when she described what she was going to do and how. I was thinking, adjectives? Really? Let's not turn this into a romance novel, lady. (To even further complicate things, I'll admit I was molested at 14 by my stepfather and as a result, I struggled with a bit of homosexuality in high school...and, of course, I had just gotten married. Niiice, I thought.)
I admit, sadly, that I did not realize beforehand how much a "pat-down" would entail. It was more of a rub-down. And yeah, it was "slowly." And with the palm of her hand, with pressure, just about everywhere you could imagine. Later, I heard that they do it to intimidate people into the less personally humiliating option: the scanner. Well, I guess it worked. Bravo. I, a young female, was officially humiliated in a sexual way. And read: I had just come from my
honeymoon. That woman touched me in a way that I would not even let my fiancé, the closest person to me in the world, touch me a week prior.
Walking away, the only thing in my mind was that I had just gotten completely felt up by a girl. Eeww. I tried to ignore it as DH and I tried to find a restaurant. Finally, once we had eaten (I may have only eaten about half of my food and didn't want to eat anymore; I don't remember), I admitted that I could not ignore it any longer. I felt violated. I felt like I no longer had control over anyone invading my own personal bubble. I actually did cry a bit. Call me a wimp if you like, it's how I felt. I actually felt a little sick to my stomach, and like I had zero control over what just happened. I hate to speak in these terms, too, because this is a political issue, not an emotional one. But did anyone ever expect—outside of living in a Middle Eastern country (read: the terrorists have won)—that we would have to worry about our sexual boundaries being violated by the government? How did it even get this far?
The next is a must for this discussion.
Bill of Rights, Amendment IV:
Right of Search and Seizure Regulated.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Mandating these invasive searches to everybody is in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment. Additionally, the context of the Amendment is to protect citizens during wartime, so one cannot even use the excuse that the threat of what is technically guerrilla warfare (terrorism) makes these measures excusable. If anyone
were to suggest we up and change the Bill of Rights (some progressives argue that the Constitution is becoming obsolete), I suggest that in all propriety here we at least wait until peacetime.
Definition of a "search" (via
Wikipedia:)
In Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), the Supreme Court ruled that a search occurs only when 1) a person expects privacy in the thing searched (sexual places, private areas...check) and 2) society believes that expectation is reasonable (I would think so).
Thankfully, the
ACLU is also pitching a fit, as is
Penn (the Christian's friend, again) Jillette, who called the cops on the TSA for sexual assault and was treated like a celebrity. Additionally, read John Tyner's now famous "Don't Touch My Junk"
blog post.
As a woman, given the choice to either be seen or touched (or
pay a hefty fine, apparently), I would choose neither. Both are against my religious beliefs. And if anything else (since
religious beliefs apparently mean nothing now, I find my personal bubble important and also protected by the Fourth Amendment.
TSA, don't ever touch my junk again.
Ok. Let's end on a happy note. Check out this photo via
BoingBoing:
 |
| Would go great with the living room decor... |
(Seriously, who went through the time to make that thing?)